If your only loss is to the player who goes 5-0, and that loss is the final loss of the day, you're going to make top 4.The tournament does have a self-KO clause. However, they probably also allow intentional draws if both players agree to it. The Explosion thing at the end didn't actually mean anything. A 4-0-1 record guarantees placement while 4-1 does not. I'm not sure if Vash and 616 knew for certain that they would advance if they had a 4-1 record. If they didn't, a intentional draw was the right thing to do. While it is unfortunate what happened to zerowing, making sure you get get to the Worlds yourself should take priority. If they knew they were both safe, it probably would have been better for 616 to throw the match to help out zerowing. I'm not sure if this would have knocked alakapimp out of the Top 4, though. I'm also not sure they had enough time to figure all of this out.
Yeah, that's like Nintendo breaking their own rules. If they didn't intend on enforcing self-ko clause they should have taken it out of the rules.That's nowhere to be found in the rules, however. I can't imagine them "allowing" two players to call a draw, either.
He also put himself in the position where he would get the loss anyway since he broke one of the rules.In reality, Vash and 616 did exactly what the majority of us probably would have done. If you have the potential to gurantee your spot in the finals of an international tournament, would you have continued the match and possibly put yourself in the position where you could be eliminated later on? I know I wouldn't have. Yes, it completely screwed zerowing, but thats the game.
Totally right.In reality, Vash and 616 did exactly what the majority of us probably would have done. If you have the potential to gurantee your spot in the finals of an international tournament, would you have continued the match and possibly put yourself in the position where you could be eliminated later on? I know I wouldn't have. Yes, it completely screwed zerowing, but thats the game.
Allowing intentional draws isn't a particularly unusual practise. I know the Pokemon TCG allowed intentional draws many years ago. I'm not sure if they still do or if it extends to the video games tournaments.That's nowhere to be found in the rules, however. I can't imagine them "allowing" two players to call a draw, either.
No way would I go that far. Flights 2 and 4 (orange and yellow) were jokes. Really only IPL emerged from them and all of the matches from these flights that I observed were absolutely disastrous.Whoah, Slimceagirl kicked ass. I had no idea she was so good.
Exactly. Its a strategy, everyone went in with one. Sidd even changed his throughout the day. It was the strategy they used and they should be happy they realized they could both secure themselves a spot.Totally right.
You can't blame them one bit.
Well, it appears that he didn't because he is still in the competition and tied first place in one of the four areas.He also put himself in the position where he would get the loss anyway since he broke one of the rules.
From what zerowing said, Vash had the upper hand, but instead of beating 616, he offered him the ability to tie which in turn would maintain their records of 4-0, thus securing their spots because they were the only ones without a loss. I was referring to "secure your spot" in the sense that they guranteed themselves a spot in the top 4.I don't think Vash actually helped.
And how do you:"Secure your spot" not that it matters now , just wondering.
Because he could have allowed a better smogoner (by his own words, he should have lost to zerowing) to get in to the top 4. I am with zerowing on this one, they did not think of the consequences of their actions and acted foolishly.Exactly. Its a strategy, everyone went in with one. Sidd even changed his throughout the day. It was the strategy they used and they should be happy they realized they could both secure themselves a spot.
I am particularly surprised by Vash because it sounds like he could have secured his spot regardless. In the end, he helped another Smogoner, so why is he getting trashed?
616's Opponent's Win % isn't that much higher than 3rd and 4th place. The 3-2's with the highest Opponent's Win % are also pretty close to 616's. It would depend on what the Round 4 results looked like, but I have doubts the Round 4 results indicate 616 as a 100% lock to finish in the Top 4 if 616 lost the last match and even if they did, I'm not sure it was obvious enough for them to notice without having to do a bunch of calculations and theortetical scenarios.If your only loss is to the player who goes 5-0, and that loss is the final loss of the day, you're going to make top 4.
Wow dude, harsh. So was the 2 point Infracture, I though you were only kidding, lol. I guess that can be removed (by you?) if somehow Infracts add up and get me to ICBB though. <3So I like to thank you two for being dumbfucks and not getting me a trip to San Deigo to participate. I can accept the 1 turn sleep, it was luck, luck is part of the game. But when you two decide to conspire to cause a tie, you didn't think of the implications of what would happen, and because you fuck faces decided to have some "fun" it trickles to me and and I suffer.
Thanks. Jerks.
In reality, Vash and 616 did exactly what the majority of us probably would have done. If you have the potential to gurantee your spot in the finals of an international tournament, would you have continued the match and possibly put yourself in the position where you could be eliminated later on? I know I wouldn't have. Yes, it completely screwed zerowing, but thats the game.
Well basically, it was like this:Totally right.
You can't blame them one bit.
To be fair, if you're playing in a tournament to win prizes, your first priority should be on getting as far as you can yourself, other players be damned. If calling a draw is the safest way to guarantee yourself a spot, and is allowed by the rules, what Vash/616 did was a smart move. The one-turn sleep was unfortunate, but that's "part of the game," and Vash did nothing wrong by capitalizing on it as much as possible.I am with zerowing on this one, they did not think of the consequences of their actions and acted foolishly.
All of them are good or they wouldn't have gotten their in the first place. I am upset that zerowing didn't make it in because I was here when everyone was trying for those spots last year. I think he did deserve a spot. Im just saying, Vash had the potential to help a fellow smogoner, which he did. Had he beaten 616, then that spot would have been left open to whoever had the highest percent, which could or could not have been a smogoner. It is for that reason, that I think that they must have been some thought process behind their decision. In the end, as its been said numerous times already, the game is one of luck. Zerowing lost to Vash through luck and it ended unfortunately for him. You can't expect someone to ruin their own chances for someone else and more importantly, you can't get mad at them for it. What would you have done in that situation?Because he could have allowed a better smogoner (by his own words, he should have lost to zerowing) to get in to the top 4. I am with zerowing on this one, they did not think of the consequences of their actions and acted foolishly.
While this part is true, I think what he did was better though. At that point, he couldn't have done anything that he knew of to effect zerowing's standings, but he did know that he could help 616.OK, if zerowing actually infracted vash because he caused him to lose, I think that's a little childish. While I understand being frustrated about what happened, I don't think power abuse is the right solution. Now moving on to what vash said, I don't think he (vash) was TRYING to force zerowing out. If anyone is insinuating that, I would disagree with them heartily. He was trying to be kind to sixonesix, but he did not think of the possible repercussions of his actions. In the end, I agree with Syberia. I would have rather Vash go for the win and knock both sixonesix and zerowing out than tie and knock zerowing out. Think of yourself, other people be damned.
Welcome to video game forum moderating.OK, if zerowing actually infracted vash because he caused him to lose, I think that's a little childish.
Vash and 616 were 4-0 in the final round, so if 616 lost like he should have, he would still have a high percentage cause he lost to the best person in the last round. I would think it would be like that at least. Also, this would mean zerowing would have had a better percentage also, and the people who lost to 616 a worse percentage.All of them are good or they wouldn't have gotten their in the first place. I am upset that zerowing didn't make it in because I was here when everyone was trying for those spots last year. I think he did deserve a spot. Im just saying, Vash had the potential to help a fellow smogoner, which he did. Had he beaten 616, then that spot would have been left open to whoever had the highest percent, which could or could not have been a smogoner. It is for that reason, that I think that they must have been some thought process behind their decision. In the end, as its been said numerous times already, the game is one of luck. Zerowing lost to Vash through luck and it ended unfortunately for him. You can't expect someone to ruin their own chances for someone else and more importantly, you can't get mad at them for it. What would you have done in that situation?
How exactly did they calculate "Opponent's Win %"? I would have thought it was "number of times your opponents won" divided by "number of times your opponents battled" but that would always produce percentages that were a multiple of 4. I'm guessing they accounted for the margin of victory somehow?