As you can probably guess by my supposedly "ridiculous" stance on competitive Pokemon that you know all too well, I completely agree. I feel that we should only play competitively with things that are made available to all within the games themselves (which is why I think Mew, Celebi, etc should be banned) and other than that, have virtually no bans/clauses (especially those that the game doesn't provide a method of enforcing). In the same sense, there is no auto-create feature in Pokemon games. TPCI shouldn't allow any hacking, period. In the rules it said that the use of external devices is prohibited. You use it, you get DQed, end of story (from exceeding EVs to the auto-egg hatchers and 999 Master Ball users). The fact that Alakapimp got a free pass only convolutes TPCI's stance on hacking even further.
Which, as I'm sure you realize, is the reason I posted. If I didn't care I would be content to think "lol tournaments" as I already did before the VGC. I don't know how it's remotely acceptable to not be consistent here, when you're talking about the money and time the players have to expend that I already referenced.
What solution do you have to offer? The 6 Pokemon singles that can take anywhere from 10 minutes to one hour? Or do you suggest 1v1 Stadium Mode, an even more Rock-Paper-Scissors type metagame than doubles.
First, if I were actually in a position to positively impact how these tournaments are run you can bet that I would take it. I'm pretty sure a lot of people who post here at Smogon would love a meaningful job with Nintendo of America or TPCI.
Second, I will remind you that if there is anyone here who has demonstrated that he is willing to devote countless hours of effort and thought into orchestrating competitive pokémon, it's me. It's not a coincidence that creator of the Suspect Test Process that aims to better competitive pokemon is the one who posted the rant you replied to. (I will also take this opportunity to point out that the results of Suspect Test process do indeed stretch to Wi-fi, as Latias started to see use in "standard" Wi-fi battles the day she was given a Stage 2 OU Tag, so any argument that the efforts of myself and the other Tiering Contributors apply only to Shoddy would be invalid.)
Usually when challenging someone to offer a solution to a problem the person expressed disappointment in, it is done to imply that the person is not willing or able to do so and is being a armchair quarterback. It can be an effective tactic, but if the implication was intentional, I again remind you that I am just about the last person on these forums or even any pokemon community who wouldn't be both willing and able to actually do something to benefit competitive pokemon.
So that said, yes, I would try out a 6v6 official tournaments. Your less subtle implication here is that they can take way too long to be feasible for a good tournament. I ask you, what's worse—having pokemon battles that may take 30-40 minutes longer than 2v2 ones to complete, or driving 1300 miles for little more than the hacked intangible pixels I referred to earlier? And do you honestly think that the same people who are willing to drive those 1300 miles for a pokemon tournament are the same people who would even remotely care about a battle taking 30 minutes longer than a doubles one would?
Further, do you think that these people actually prefer doubles to singles? Do you think that Nintendo is actually reaching out to more people and drawing more people in with doubles tourneys than they would if they promoted singles tournaments? There is almost no evidence to support that doubles would actually get them more participants than singles. The cartridges have tried to promote doubles by increasing the number of "mandatory" doubles battles in the game, but besides this, there's nothing that Nintendo's trying to do in the actual games to really promote doubles. The cartoon is an even worse offender in the doubles cause, assuming there even is one—doubles battle are very rare and conducted confusingly when they happen. Doubles-exclusive moves like Helping Hand and Follow Me are rarely if even seen (I vaguely recall an episode about Plusle and Minun that features HH but I'm not going to look it up and remember the episode more for the two pokemon than anything noteworthy or memorable about doubles). None of the movies have even prominently featured doubles to my memory either, at least not to the point where a considerable number of people would actually be attracted to pokemon and the cartridges and therefore doubles tournaments more than they would be if any of the movies were not successful in this ultimate aim of getting people to the tourneys through "non-doubles efforts" (which means everything else but doubles).
In conclusion, if Nintendo's actually been trying to make doubles more popular so that their tournaments that they seem to insist on being doubles are better attended, they're not doing a good job of it. I don't think they're trying, but this of course begs the real question of "why is everything doubles".
To get back on track, if the speed of 1v1 battles were an issue, I would actually use a Doduo or Dodrio mode to speed up the Regional, National and World battles. It's not as if this "technology" hasn't existed for a decade or anything, or that it couldn't be easily utilized on the Regional, National and World level if speed is actually a concern.
And I personally don't think that a 1v1 Stadium Mode is more "Rock Paper Scissors" than 2v2 is. What's more important is that I
definitely don't think that this is the reason Nintendo hasn't tried it. I've actually posted on these forums a couple times that best-of-three or -five Stadium Mode battles would go a long way to combating the valid concern of one 3v3 battle deciding an entire match, and this would still allow matches to be completed in a very quick fashion.
Finally, I'm not going to flatter myself by saying I hope someone at Nintendo is reading my posts about this, or that if my ideas are used up it will be unfair to me or something dumb like that, because if I cared about that I wouldn't post them. I will say that it
is someone's actual job to come up with ideas like this and try them out. It's also easy for me to criticize the official tourneys from afar, and not even be cognizant of the many good things that do go into the tournaments (or at least not acknowledge them). But I literally don't know if these things have been thought of, and that's what bothers me.
I have two things to say about this point. First, is that you only get in if you show up. Everyone who went knew that there was a chance that they wouldn't get to play. Was I upset that I didn't get in at two tournaments? Sure. Could I live with the question in my mind of if I would've gotten in and won? No. It's a risk and everyone knew it. You can't win the lottery unless you pay up and buy a ticket. Second, and more importantly, give it time. This is a work in progress, being only year 2 of the VGC. They're not going to get handed more money than they can prove that they need, especially with money being as tight as it is. People showing the interest in the tournament and making these long drives is going to make this tournament grow faster.
It is a risk everyone knows, and my point is that this is not really going to help them in future tournaments if they want them to be more successful. Everyone knowing this may have hurt the expected turnout if it had been conducted differently, which is something I think or at least hope they've considered.
And, money may be tight for them but it's much tighter for their target audience. Do you think Omega and ipl would have been as keen on trekking 3100 miles last year when gas prices were $4.00 per gallon? Or that the effects of the bad economy didn't still keep families (which I again intentionally use instead of players) from making a three-hour trip for a tourney that son or daughter may not even have a chance to play in?
Also, Pokemon Diamond, Pearl and Platinum were wildly successful, considering that Pokemon is Nintendo's best-selling game all time. You'd think that if anyone had the money to be able to try and make more money off of an already huge success through Official Tournaments, it would be NOA, but I'm just guessing here cause I'm not about to actually look up their financials.
Could a pre-registration have been coordinated before the tournament? Yes. Does TPCI particularly want to do that? No. When it comes down to it, this tournament is a huge advertizing scheme in an effort to publicize Pokemon and get more people to buy the latest game. Besides, when they're in a growing stage like this, they need numbers to show up. With pre-registration, I bet the numbers at the tournaments would be half of what they were, if not less. If it looks like there's little interest, how are they going to convince the executives to cough up the cash to help this thing grow? They're not going to give more money to something that isn't stirring up crazy amounts of interest in Pokemon.
I've touched on a lot of this already, agree with most of it, and am glad you at least see the point of these tournaments. I think their numbers would be a lot better if they did singles tournaments, as I've stated. And maybe if those who precommitted were guaranteed a free plushie, while those who did not had a better chance of getting in than those promised the plushie, the effect of this "advertising" would have been better for all parties. Offering something like 500 plushies nationwide or 1,000 for the whole world or something is seriously a drop in the Wailmer Pail for not only Nintendo but NOA and The Pokémon Company as well, given how much Nintendo has made from Pokemon. They don't have to be big plushies at all, even three inches or whatever is good enough for the effect. Like $2,000-$5,000 to manufacture and ship 1,000 free plushies around the world to Regional and National Tournament sites of, say, the starter pokemon of Generation Whatever? That would be made up by just one of every ten people targeted by this marketing scheme buying the Gen five pokemon game (or HGSS to be realistic, or both) that would not otherwise have. Hell, they could even make the plushies be Ho-oh and Lugia dolls to
directly promote interest in their next game.
And I just thought of this off the top of my head in like two minutes, with no big ad agency or marketing directive at all. I'm not patting myself on the back or anything of even really insisting it's a great idea, but as I stated above, I honestly wonder if they are thinking of stuff like this, or if they really think a Shiny Milotic is good enough to help advertise the game, or at least a good enough "parting gift" for those who came all the way for literally nothing else.
I tried to stay on your main point of how it is sickening that someone was allowed to continue because their hack didn't matter, which I agree with. However, all of these criticisms of the tournament that are being thrown around really tick me off. Everyone here acts like it's Pokemon's duty to host these tournaments for us. If I were running the tournament, I'd be tempted to just drop it entirely, given how ungrateful everyone is. The fact of the matter is that it's a work in progress. It seems that no one takes the initiative to write in a thoughtful letter with suggestions. For those who haven't already, ideas and critiques should be sent here:
customerservice@go-pokemon.com
If you were running the tournaments and were tempted to drop them, you'd probably be fired for even suggesting it. You're giving Smogon way too much credit here for the "ungrateful everyone"—I highly doubt the Sponsors and Nintendo think everyone is ungrateful for their efforts. And what would they care? "We" are going to buy the next game anyway, aren't we? What's it to them if they're able to reach out to just enough new people to offset the cost of them holding these tournaments?
Overall, your entire rant is pretty hypocritical. Alot of similar criticisms could be thrown at Smogon too. How many people put in hard work on the site only to get some "hacked up pixels" in the form of a badge? In return though, chaos gets to sit on the heaps of money that he collects off of the site. What's more is that in the grand scheme of things, they were tricked into writing articles for a metagame that no one but Smogon cares about. While Smogon had people wasting their time on countless 1v1 analysis revamps, people could've been writing them for a pertinent metagame. A metagame, that if Smogon put the effort into studying, would yield more publicity via the VGC than it could ever hope for.
I honestly think you're way off base here, lol. We wrote and write for the site because we knew what we were getting into. We didn't expect money or anything else, and we still don't. The comparison to the chance of getting to play in a tournament is therefore pretty faulty. We didn't set out in 2004 to write articles so that, someday five years later when Smogon is actually a legitimate success, we could ask chaos for the money we deserved five years ago. Wasting time, haha...I'd rather waste time writing articles (or even long posts on internet forums) than spending $100 on gas driving 400 miles for a tournament I won't get into or get anything out of besides some random UU pokemon.
And "metagame that no one but Smogon cares about", that's kind of rich. Keep telling yourself that, and I will keep watching random youtube battles that feature strategies and competitive movesets that originated on Smogon. And that, *gasp* aren't 2v2. Can you tell me the last time you saw a YouTube battle of 2v2? Does
anybody play 2v2? Anyone? Seriously? And spare me a "it's because Smogon doesn't promote it" argument, please—you can't blame us for not promoting 2v2 while at the same time continue to think that Nintendo's tournaments are the untouchable be all and end all of competitive pokemon.
And maybe we care a lot more about actually making competitive pokemon better and being the #1 site for competitive pokemon than "yielding more publicity" or trying to make money.
You can bet that Omegadonut spent his time formulating a team for a tournament that mattered. He has a Wii, DSi, trophies, trips, Pokemon goodies, the possibility of winning even more, and the official title of National Pokemon Champion. What do Smogon tournament winners have to show for what they've done? How many players have been promised t-shirts and Pokemon XD for winning Smogon tours and Official Smogon tournaments, only to never receive them?
I don't know, ask Aeolus or something. Not in my recent memory have we promised a T-Shirt for winning a tourney, whatever you're referencing happened like three years ago and Aeolus and our Tournament staff have learned form our mistakes and seen the popularity of our Tournaments and Smogon Tours grow at every turn. And we definitely didn't have the funds to be able to offer anything at all, I don't know why you think comparing what we can offer materially to what a company ranked as high as #28 in the Fortune 500 can is a fair comparison, let alone a relevant one. Our progress regardless is far more promising than someone being disqualified for having too many pokeballs in their bag three years ago, then someone else being guilty of a worse infraction just two days ago in the latest tournament but being excused. Which says nothing of the fact that we are literally kids and young adults trying to run these tournaments, where Nintendo and TPCI is made up of professionals who make money for this stuff.
Also, I'm sure OmegaDonut would rather his official title not be sullied by the very real specter of one of his fellow World Championship participants not being blatantly guilty of hacking.
And I hate to say I told you so, but you have forever championed Nintendo and their tournaments and their metagame as king, and faulted us here at Smogon for not following them or promoting 2v2. Aside from my repeated insistence that you personally do this in a reasonable manner, tell me why this latest step in the wrong direction of how Nintendo holds their Official Tournaments should be anything but discouraging to me and the rest of the people here at Smogon who have a say in what we "study". Maybe you shouldn't be such a Nintendo apologist. Maybe you're the one being tricked here into supporting blindly, even after they spit in your face by allowing someone who admitted to the hacking you utterly despise to get in and make it to Worlds while your pristine, unsullied hands did not even get a chance to reach for a Regional Title this year.
edit: actually, don't bother responding to the stuff about us being hypocritical. besides most of it being wrong, it's actually off topic since it has nothing to do with nintendo's tourney and how they could make it better