its horrible. and the SSRI brain-shocks... theyre the worst. basically anyone touchin you suddenly, or callin your name, or anythin that startles you, gives you a jolt-like feelin in your brain.Wait, is it really that bad to stop SSRI's cold turkey?
Wow. I guess I can count myself lucky then, that never happened to me.its horrible. and the SSRI brain-shocks... theyre the worst. basically anyone touchin you suddenly, or callin your name, or anythin that startles you, gives you a jolt-like feelin in your brain.
not to add that youre like a zombie and a lot of other shit goes unstable too.
All drugs should be legal. The Government has no right to tell you what you can and can't do with your body, as long as you aren't harming anybody.Back on topic though, what are your arguments for the legalization of marijuana? Just curious as to what you all say.
congratulations, you just contradicted yourself in two sentencesAll drugs should be legal. The Government has no right to tell you what you can and can't do with your body, as long as you aren't harming anybody.
Minors, on the other hand, still shouldn't be able to buy them.
The takeaway lesson for me in particular: don't do drugs you dumbass
lmao. I actually noticed that, I just didn't bother to modify it.congratulations, you just contradicted yourself in two sentences
I will say this about the legality of psychedelics, though: the way they allow you to operate completely outside society can make them...incompatible with society. On a personal level they might not cause any harm but on a larger scale not so much.
what do you mean by this? I've never tried any drugs, but I've always been interested by this thread. Never heard someone mention psychedelics' negative effect on society rather than the user.I will say this about the legality of psychedelics, though: the way they allow you to operate completely outside society can make them...incompatible with society. On a personal level they might not cause any harm but on a larger scale not so much.
They blow your mind open: make you see how everything, especially societal norms and customs, are arbitrary. You begin to question them, which is detrimental when society hinges on the masses behaving in certain ways. I'm exaggerating somewhat, since this described breakdown of society would only occur if you had a significant fraction of the population who indulge in psychedelics, and even then society would just need to adjust itself to handle a bunch of free thinkers.what do you mean by this? I've never tried any drugs, but I've always been interested by this thread. Never heard someone mention psychedelics' negative effect on society rather than the user.
just had first proper blunt (ceegar papeer unt marywana)
will review it whe not trippin balls
Any university philosophy, politics, gender studies, creative writing, literature art history, history of consciousness, and probably psychology regiment worth the name instructs students in psychoanalysis and social constructionist theory which is basically dedicated to analyzing how society constructs normalcy. I think that anyone who thinks a bit or does a bit of reading can come to the same conclusions that, allegedly, psychedelics cause individuals to come to. I think that it's a silly assertion because for my experiences with psychedelics it's been mainly "Damn thats fucking pretty" or "Damn I can see and feel the music like a wave." Yeah you can have what I call 'acid thought' where you make connections between seemingly unrelated things in a semi-meaningful way that you'd never noticed before, but that's not really the point imo.They blow your mind open: make you see how everything, especially societal norms and customs, are arbitrary. You begin to question them, which is detrimental when society hinges on the masses behaving in certain ways. I'm exaggerating somewhat, since this described breakdown of society would only occur if you had a significant fraction of the population who indulge in psychedelics, and even then society would just need to adjust itself to handle a bunch of free thinkers.
Yes, these conclusions are completely and often attainable without drugs. However, I think they become unignorable when you're on drugs: during day-to-day life it's relatively easy to sweep such conclusions under the carpet.Any university philosophy, politics, gender studies, creative writing, literature art history, history of consciousness, and probably psychology regiment worth the name instructs students in psychoanalysis and social constructionist theory which is basically dedicated to analyzing how society constructs normalcy. I think that anyone who thinks a bit or does a bit of reading can come to the same conclusions that, allegedly, psychedelics cause individuals to come to. I think that it's a silly assertion because for my experiences with psychedelics it's been mainly "Damn thats fucking pretty" or "Damn I can see and feel the music like a wave." Yeah you can have what I call 'acid thought' where you make connections between seemingly unrelated things in a semi-meaningful way that you'd never noticed before, but that's not really the point imo.
it's in the same ballpark as tobacco or alcohol but with less to no risk of physical harm depending on consumption routes.Back on topic though, what are your arguments for the legalization of marijuana? Just curious as to what you all say.
does weed interfere with serotonin production?2. in a regulated market or personally grown i would not have gotten weed sprayed with synthetic cannabanoids that even more strongly interfere with serotonin production
Neverhave you not heard of erowid or something?