Sounds like quite an interesting team strategy.Oddly, it was a Tailwind Braviary. : I Really, I just let it happen. Even better, he had a Galvantula slow me down with Electroweb. After that and Tailwind, Trick Room spelled immediate game over.
This. With apparently around 35,000 registered people, it should be almost impossible, and yet it keeps happening to me. And I realize not everyone's on at once, of course... But it still seems like I shouldn't see the same person three times during the course of a day.And... the match system is pretty bad when I get paired with the same person twice in a row.
She wouldn't even start the game against me.6. RIKA, Tokyo 1969 4-3, disconnected as soon as a Specs Chandelure boosted by Tailwind sweep was certain (Come on, your team was a bunch of strong crap thrown together with no plan at all, at least don't artificially boost your rank).
RIKA also disconnected against me yesterday just before their last Pokemon was taken out. I did get a Turn 1 critical, but was confident on winning even if it didn't happen. They were at 1804 at that point.She wouldn't even start the game against me.
Screw 6th gen, do it with the 3DS Gray version!Hopefully this little issue will be addressed in the 6th gen.
I'm not holding my breath for nintendo to do something about the d.cers.
But what if the d.cer is using black or white?Screw 6th gen, do it with the 3DS Gray version!
For all I care you can create an isolated Gray ladder as long as this BS is avoided, and 3D battles would sell the game anyways to mitigate angry people.But what if the d.cer is using black or white?
Then what happens with the results?
RIKA also disconnected against me yesterday just before their last Pokemon was taken out. I did get a Turn 1 critical, but was confident on winning even if it didn't happen. They were at 1804 at that point.
I trashed her in two turns and she d.ced on me.RIKA also disconnected against me yesterday just before their last Pokemon was taken out. I did get a Turn 1 critical, but was confident on winning even if it didn't happen. They were at 1804 at that point.
lol. I've explained what happened and my history speaks for itself, I don't D/C on purpose. My rating would be a lot higher if I D/C'd after every bit of hax.Wish I could say the same. He d/c'd on me this morning when I had a clear, hax-free win on the way.
Good to know he changed his ways after being busted.
But there was no hax when we battled...Just sayin'.lol. I've explained what happened and my history speaks for itself, I don't D/C on purpose. My rating would be a lot higher if I D/C'd after every bit of hax.
Negativity aside I've finished today on a high note IMO, just hit the 100 battles mark and my rating's 1847.
Thats CRAZY good Im way lower than that.Just updating my records so far.
I'm at w W/L of 64-6 and a rating of 1947.
I faced you I think yesterday, gg.Thats CRAZY good Im way lower than that.