Those are definitely points worth considering moving forward. The Viability Rankings are something I hope sees a lot more work put into it (including my own contributions and maintenance of them) in Gen VII. Once we have definitive information on Dartrix, Torracat, Brionne, Alolan Graveler, Hakamo-o, and all the new Middle Cup eligible Pokemon (I believe we're only getting around 8 or 9 new Pokemon in total, which is unfortunate), then I'll start up the VR and analyses again. In the weeks leading up to the start of the new generation, I'll begin reforming the Viability Rankings. I'll make note of an 'official' time and date soon once I know how the coming weeks are going to fare.
On the topic of analyses, I think we'll stick to in-thread versions until every viable Pokemon has something resembling an analysis. Only then will I look into having them moved on-site. I'd like to get the under the official format, and it shouldn't be too much of a problem to do that. This just ensures more community involvement and avoids the massive workloads that the few of us saw when trying to complete the ORAS ones (which never happened).
Also, when Sun and Moon drop, I'll unban eviolite at the start of the generation. I was really hoping for a larger number of useful Pokemon, or at least 4 with good stats. Initial stat breakdowns suggest we won't be seeing that, so in order to balance the metagame a bit, I think adding Eviolite to the mix is necessary. The only real casualty of this will be Chansey (I can't see Porygon2 or Dusclops being too busted with it, if not, add them to this list), and it just makes more sense to shrink our banlist as much as possible considering we only have ~25-30 useful Pokemon. It's a decision I'm willing to go back on if it turns out that an Eviolite metagame isn't a good metagame, but it's something I think we need to test.