be the upgraded version of me
Foresty, you fell into "banning the next best thing" yourself. Raikou is undoubtedly UU's top contender with its amazing status distribution that puts it above the rest of UU with its Speed, power, and bulk. Raikou is somewhat analagous to Garchomp in OU... except Raikou does not have Sand Veil or the powerful Ground / Dragon coverage that toppled Garchomp out of OU.
Raikou is vulnerable to entry hazards and does not have wall-breaking power. It's a great mid- late-game sweeper, but it needs proper team support to function at all - you still have to do work to win with Raikou. Just like you can make a team that hates on Swampert and Snorlax, it's perfectly possible to make a team that hates on Raikou (and all teams should be prepared for UU's #1 threat). CM Raikou is easily revenged by Scarfers and SubCM Raikou hits really weak without CM boosts.
This metagame is perfectly balanced - all of these top threats highlighted as suspects - Raikou, Chandelure, Kingdra - are the Terrakion, Salamence, and Dragonite of UU; they are all top contenders of UU, but the metagame has all the resources to prevent them from having free reign. They are all awesome mons, but not "too good." Give us a Raikou with Quiver Dance or Shell Smash (or even NP) and we'd have a pokemon worthy of suspect status. Atm, we're just doing a desperate witch hunt for the sake of suspecting something that's remotely good.
Before banning anything, sand should have a proper test without Sand Veil. kokoloko has said during last stage that we will test sand when the metagame stabilizes, and there's no better time than now. Reading from the suspect paragraphs (sans upstart), a few things are clear. First, all senators believe that Sand Veil's 20% miss hax is uncompetitive. Second, sand / 2x Speed Stoutland is perfectly manageable. So why not ban Sand Veil and Sand Veil alone? Some people highlighted the annoyance of the passive damage from Sand, but that's NOTHING compared to the residual damage from entry hazards, scald burns, leech seed, or Life Orb recoil. Just stating a fact (ie Raikou has 115 base Speed / residual damage hurts my Pokemon) does not make it a justification for a ban. Those who argued for a Sandstream ban, argued that the "whole package" of sand is the reason for its exile. However the only "bad thing" about sand teams are the sand-dependent abilities, not the direct effects of summoning sand itself (passive damage, 50% SpD boosts to Rock-types). If we can ban these abilities in isolation from sand (Sand Veil and maybe Sand Rush), why not do so?
I understand that sand has received major buffs in Stoutland receiving Superpower and Sandslash having its Sand Rush released, but tiering decisions are not based on theorymon. Frankly, the previous suspect stage was sloppy, with upstart not even providing a proper paragraph / explanation of his ban decision (iirc), and guest members like Aldaron making a decision instead (again, not providing any paragraph to legitimize his thoughts; not even sure if he even plays UU). Sand deserves a second chance / proper testing without the douchiness of Sand Veil, as kokoloko has promised. If anything, sand would de-centralize the current UU that revolves around Raikou, Kingdra, etc, which were top threats in the sand meta, too.
More of my thoughts on sand:
http://www.smogon.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4294912&postcount=407
http://www.smogon.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4294999&postcount=411
Raikou is vulnerable to entry hazards and does not have wall-breaking power. It's a great mid- late-game sweeper, but it needs proper team support to function at all - you still have to do work to win with Raikou. Just like you can make a team that hates on Swampert and Snorlax, it's perfectly possible to make a team that hates on Raikou (and all teams should be prepared for UU's #1 threat). CM Raikou is easily revenged by Scarfers and SubCM Raikou hits really weak without CM boosts.
This metagame is perfectly balanced - all of these top threats highlighted as suspects - Raikou, Chandelure, Kingdra - are the Terrakion, Salamence, and Dragonite of UU; they are all top contenders of UU, but the metagame has all the resources to prevent them from having free reign. They are all awesome mons, but not "too good." Give us a Raikou with Quiver Dance or Shell Smash (or even NP) and we'd have a pokemon worthy of suspect status. Atm, we're just doing a desperate witch hunt for the sake of suspecting something that's remotely good.
Before banning anything, sand should have a proper test without Sand Veil. kokoloko has said during last stage that we will test sand when the metagame stabilizes, and there's no better time than now. Reading from the suspect paragraphs (sans upstart), a few things are clear. First, all senators believe that Sand Veil's 20% miss hax is uncompetitive. Second, sand / 2x Speed Stoutland is perfectly manageable. So why not ban Sand Veil and Sand Veil alone? Some people highlighted the annoyance of the passive damage from Sand, but that's NOTHING compared to the residual damage from entry hazards, scald burns, leech seed, or Life Orb recoil. Just stating a fact (ie Raikou has 115 base Speed / residual damage hurts my Pokemon) does not make it a justification for a ban. Those who argued for a Sandstream ban, argued that the "whole package" of sand is the reason for its exile. However the only "bad thing" about sand teams are the sand-dependent abilities, not the direct effects of summoning sand itself (passive damage, 50% SpD boosts to Rock-types). If we can ban these abilities in isolation from sand (Sand Veil and maybe Sand Rush), why not do so?
I understand that sand has received major buffs in Stoutland receiving Superpower and Sandslash having its Sand Rush released, but tiering decisions are not based on theorymon. Frankly, the previous suspect stage was sloppy, with upstart not even providing a proper paragraph / explanation of his ban decision (iirc), and guest members like Aldaron making a decision instead (again, not providing any paragraph to legitimize his thoughts; not even sure if he even plays UU). Sand deserves a second chance / proper testing without the douchiness of Sand Veil, as kokoloko has promised. If anything, sand would de-centralize the current UU that revolves around Raikou, Kingdra, etc, which were top threats in the sand meta, too.
More of my thoughts on sand:
http://www.smogon.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4294912&postcount=407
http://www.smogon.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4294999&postcount=411