As a Laker fan, I am predisposed to hate the Celtics but I agree with this 100 %. They were robbed plain and simple.Celtics got robbed. Rondo was fucking amazing though. Player of the game, for sure.
lol who the fuck are the refs kidding Dwayne Wade karate kicked Garnett in the stomach and KG gets the foul. Then the refs correctly review and change Rondo's phantom 3 but don't review that shit.Even the announcers could not cover that one up.
(although they finally got around to pretending that in "some situations" that is not a foul lol)
When the reffing is bad even by NBA standards you have a problem. Sorry Boston, Stern doesn't want you in the finals.loling
Celtics drive to rim: you get pushed by one guy, have your hand hit by another, no call
Heat drive to rim: you get the call, then you can take 3 steps with no dribbles, put a shot up, then theyll call a foul if you miss
Admittedly KG fouled Wade as well on that play, I don't know who they'd call the foul on in that case or whether a double foul can be called.lol, Wade hits Rondo in the face...should have been free throws. Instead the Heat get a 5-on-4 layup at the other end to tie it. Then Wade kicks KG and the foul is called on KG. This is embarrassing, fucking awful basketball to watch. I'm not even mad, I'm starting to feel sick after what I just watched.
Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.However, Game 2 will be a different story.
I'm gonna say Heat in 7. They're gonna work for it though.
After he had to jackknife his body because Wade jumped leading with his knee and extending his foot, which kicked Garnett at the same time. This is the NBA we watch, where that could be considered a defensive foul.Garnett hit Wade in the elbow.
that should've been a no-call situation imoAdmittedly KG fouled Wade as well on that play, I don't know who they'd call the foul on in that case or whether a double foul can be called.
Thunder might still have a chance using small ball.ESPN Stats and Info: “The Thunder used a small lineup consisting of just one big man — Kendrick Perkins, Serge Ibaka, Nick Collison or Nazr Mohammed — for just one minute in the first half before using such lineups predominantly (17 of 24 minutes) in the second half. The Thunder’s small lineups outscored the Spurs by 15, while the traditional two big man lineups were outscored by 24.”
LeBron James also attempted more free throws then most teams do in an entire game, the refs were atrocious (and I'm a neutral) and should be better in Boston, the Celtics had crazy amounts of foul trouble and Ray Allen + Kevin Garnett had sub par games, the latter (Garnett's) of which is very unlikely to be repeated. I still think the Heat will win, but two can play at that game dude, let's not try and look and everything one sidedly.Boston had a 15 point lead, Rondo had the best scoring game he's ever had and is not very likely to repeat that performance, Wade didn't show up in the first half and Miami gave up a lot with their not-so-great free throw performance, and Miami still managed to win. Yet some of you actually think Boston can win this series? I don't get it. I mean, I can understand not liking a team and wishing that some crazy string of events causing them to lose the series happens, but let's not let wishful thinking get in the way of reality.
It was? Boston literally played about as good of a game as they will EVER play. The Heat played horrific in three out of four quarters and only okay in overtime. The Heat still win. How can a anyone feasibly think the Celtics could win the series? Its just logic and facts that the Celtics are absolutely out.matched.I don't know anything about Basketball, but I know that what you just said was mostly, if not entirely, complete garbage.
With little time played against them, it's easy to see that they "outscored"Thunder might still have a chance using small ball.
"As they will ever play"? No, the only Celtic that played extremely well was Rondo. Garnett, Pierce, and Allen didn't have stellar games. The Celtics could have very well beaten the Heat, it was a possibility.It was? Boston literally played about as good of a game as they will EVER play. The Heat played horrific in three out of four quarters and only okay in overtime. The Heat still win. How can a anyone feasibly think the Celtics could win the series? Its just logic and facts that the Celtics are absolutely out.matched.
Yes, its as good as they will ever play. Boston shot 49.4% from the field and 90% from the line. They only had eight turnovers. They tied Miami in rebounds, and the Celtics are the worst rebounding team in the NBA. Their offense is very bad. Putting a performance like that together is demolishing expectations. They cant do it again and they definitely cant surpass it."As they will ever play"? No, the only Celtic that played extremely well was Rondo. Garnett, Pierce, and Allen didn't have stellar games. The Celtics could have very well beaten the Heat, it was a possibility.