be the upgraded version of me
Thank you Bummer for this cute manly banner B)
With the inception of Pokebank, we will begin Doubles's very first suspect stage!
This initial stage will have NO pre-determined suspects. We will offer you, the qualified players, the opportunity to voice your opinion on the state of the current metagame at the end of this suspect stage. If you believe there is an overly centralizing or overpowering aspect in Doubles that makes the metagame worse off, you will have a chance to nominate and discuss about your suspect(s). If you believe the current metagame is balanced at its current form, you can also voice your opinion of no suspects.
Qualifications to Nominate
Only qualified users can nominate any or no suspects. Other users can still participate in the suspect discussions.
Ladder Requirement - screenshot an alt that meets one of the two requirements
- minimum of 50 games with 3:1 win/loss ratio
- minimum of 70 games with 2:1 win/loss ratio
The council will consider all the points brought up in suspect discussions to approve or veto suspect nominations. Simple majority support from the council is enough to approve the suspect for voting. Nominating a suspect or for no suspect will be worth half a vote. So even if no nominations pass through, you will still receive credit for your participation.
Once the council approves a suspect to be voted, they will then determine the eligible voters.
Qualifications to Vote
- Attain ladder reqs outlined above (ignore this if you already met this requirement to qualify for the nomination stage)
- Contribute productively to the metagame and suspect discussions
- Earn a minimum of 5 points in the leaderboard
- Earning 25+ leaderboard points during the month(s) the suspect stage is running (December + January) will exempt you from the ladder reqs
It will take a supermajority support to change the status quo. If a suspect is truly unhealthy (or healthy if it's dropping) for the metagame, there should be an overwhelming support for its banishment (or entry). A suspect that received simple majority support may be revisited in the future.
Important Dates:
Dec. 27th - Suspect Stage 1 commences
Jan. 10th-17th - Alt ID / Suspect Discussion thread goes up - only those who met ladder reqs can nominate, but anyone can discuss on the nominated suspects
Jan. 20th - Council-approved suspects will be voted by eligible voters
Meet the Council: - the following members are in the council
- Arcticblast
- Audiosurfer (tentative)
- Joim
- Laga
- lucariojr
- Mizuhime
- Nollan
- Pwnemon
The council is composed of members who have demonstrated their competence and active commitment to Doubles. It's worth noting that we council members are subjected to the same requirements as everybody else. The council will go under revision before every suspect stage, so current active and competent contributors of Doubles may have the potential to join this body.
Rules of this Thread:
Since I will be putting up an individual thread for suspect discussions, refrain from speaking about suspects itt. Instead post about the current metagame. What Pokemon, core, or strategy is working for you? Any discoveries or revelations? Give us update on any test teams! Share a Pokemon set / cores / replays or offer critique to the ones posted. Metagame Trends? Playstyles? Overrated / Underrated Pokemon?
These posts about the metagame, as well as the suspect discussion, will be scrutinized to determine voter eligibility, so definitely post.
Enjoy Doubles, guys!
THERE IS NO LONGER A CURRENTLY ACTIVE SUSPECT TEST, BUT THIS THREAD WILL REMAIN OPEN FOR GENERAL METAGAME DISCUSSION UNTIL THE NEXT TEST.
Last edited by a moderator: