I have to agree with Ulevo here, we shouldn't be messing with Aldaron's Proposal and throwing the meta back into chaos when we don't even have a stable metagame yet. Once we do, then we can waste all the time we want testing Swift Swimmers.
EDIT:
Ubers is not a tier, it is a banlist. Playing Ubers is simply playing without any Pokemon banned.
OU and UU are 100% usage based. BL is in place because there are Pokemon that are broken in the UU metagame that do not see enough use in OU to be tiered there. Hence, BL was made to act as a banlist for UU.
You ask us to logically differentiate Blaziken from other Ubers, when you have a notable lack of logic yourself. Try to have a better understanding of what you are arguing about before making a fool of yourself.
EDIT:
Every single thing you said in this post is completely wrong. If a Pokemon is voted to Ubers, it is Uber. Whether it was previously OU is completely irrelevant. Are you saying that Skymin, Darkrai, and Deoxys-A are "less uber" than Giratina because they used to be OU? Absolutely not.OU-Banned is not Uber, its simply not. And if its not Uber totally, I think it does have the right to be considered in OU. No one ever considered Mewtwo in OU, yet Blaziken was in OU for months. You can not compare them, they are very diferent.
Ubers is hard to use as a standpoint becuase, its used both as a banlist and a tier, so if you sugest to bring something out of Uber, many will compare it to bringing real Ubers, down to OU.
Instead look a few points lower, down to OU-BL-UU. If a pokemon is banned in UU, it goes to BL, which is not the same as OU. You can not compare OU pokemon to BL pokemon, yet your are comparing real Ubers, to ones just banned from OU. Its very similar, the only diference is Ubers is compacted, even though there are structural divides. Last gen wynaut was not Uber potential, but it was banned from OU. Its a very similar case, Mewtwo is nowhere in the realm as wynaut, as with Blaziken. You need to logically diference them, instead of blindingly blanketing them.
Ubers is not a tier, it is a banlist. Playing Ubers is simply playing without any Pokemon banned.
OU and UU are 100% usage based. BL is in place because there are Pokemon that are broken in the UU metagame that do not see enough use in OU to be tiered there. Hence, BL was made to act as a banlist for UU.
You ask us to logically differentiate Blaziken from other Ubers, when you have a notable lack of logic yourself. Try to have a better understanding of what you are arguing about before making a fool of yourself.
I think that the best option, once we get to it, is to ban the individual broken Swift Swimmers. Banning Drizzle or Swift Swim would not be a good idea, as you have said, and it also avoids the complexity. The only downside is that they can't be used on Rain Dance teams or in the lower tiers, but I think that is a small price to pay compared to the effects banning Drizzle would have or the precedent that banning SwSw would set.I never stated it was a simple solution, in fact I believe the opposite. But this ban would fit Smogon's philosphy better than a plain ban on either Drizzle, cancelling an entire playstyle and opening to more and more bans, or Swift Swim, which has never been broken itself. This "complex" ban would not be that hard to program on PO and could be easily enforced on WiFi as well. The suspect process to decide the bans would definitely take some months, but it would not be impossible to do.